FPF Reference

    A.19.DECLARED-SUBSTRATE-INTERPRETIVE-VIEW:4.13 - Using the interpretive view with neighboring patterns

    Preface node heading:a-19-declared-substrate-interpretive-view-4-13-using-the-interpretive-view-with-neighboring-patterns:25178

    What this page is

    This is generated FPF reference text from the specification preface or supporting sections. It helps interpret FPF; it is not FPF Reference product documentation.

    Methodology

    Use it to understand how the specification wants to be read, then return to a route, pattern, or work packet for active work. Cite generated IDs only when the wording changes the task decision.

    Content

    Read neighboring patterns in this order once the interpretive view declaration is in place:

    • Use G.2 when the interpretive view becomes palette-first, tradition-facing atlas work. That is one local specialization of atlas interpretation, not the common family head.
    • Use F.18 when the question under repair is label choice around interpretive-view, atlas, palette, or declared-map-ref language. Naming notes may explain the labels, but they do not change the base substrate or the inspection question.
    • Use A.6.P when one passage collapses view, surface, space, map, or palette into one umbrella word. Repair the layer split first, then continue.
    • Use A.0 when cold-reader glossing is what the current line lacks. Glosses help recognition; they do not replace the base interpretive view declaration.
    • Use G.5, G.10, C.19, or C.24 when the passage starts deciding outputs, survivor sets, or planning posture.

    If a neighboring passage would change the EntityOfConcern or the base substrate posture, this pattern is no longer the governing pattern for that sentence. Reopen the base line or apply the pattern that governs the new question.

    Last Updated: 2026-06-17 — upstream FPF commit 646b0b9b (github.com/ailev/FPF)